Sepsis (main)
This page is for adult patients. For pediatric patients, see: Sepsis (peds)
Background
- Sepsis should be defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection[1]
- The infection is most commonly by bacteria, but can also be by fungi, viruses, or parasites[2]
- The most common primary sources of infection resulting in sepsis are the lungs, the abdomen, and the urinary tract[3]
- Sepsis and septic shock are major healthcare problems, killing between one in three and one in six of those affected[4]
- In-hospital mortality for septic shock is approximately 30-40%[4]
- Positive cultures are not obligatory in the diagnosis of sepsis
- Pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections, and pyelonephritis are the most common primary causes
Sepsis-3 Definitions (2016)
In 2016 new definitions were adopted for the evaluation and diagnosis of Sepsis and Septic Shock[5]
| Old Definition | Sepsis-3 Definition (2016) | |
| Sepsis | 2 SIRS criteria + suspected infection | Life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, operationalized as:
|
| Severe Sepsis | Sepsis + organ dysfunction:
|
No longer a category (subsumed into "sepsis," which now requires organ dysfunction by definition) |
| Septic Shock | Sepsis + hypotension after adequate fluid resuscitation | Sepsis PLUS:
|
qSOFA (Bedside Screening Tool)
The qSOFA was proposed as a bedside screening tool to identify patients outside the ICU who may have sepsis. It is not the definition of sepsis.[5]
SSC 2021 recommends against using qSOFA as a single screening tool for sepsis or septic shock, as it has poor sensitivity; however, it may prompt further workup when positive.[4]
qSOFA Score
Quick Sequential (Sepsis Related) Organ Failure Assessment Score
- Respiratory rate of 22/min or greater (+1 Point)
- Altered mentation (+1 Point)
- Systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or less (+1 Point)
- qSOFA ≥2 should prompt:
- Consideration of possible sepsis
- Initiation of workup (cultures, lactate, imaging)
- Assessment for organ dysfunction (formal SOFA score)
- A qSOFA <2 does not rule out sepsis
SOFA Score
- The SOFA score is the formal tool for identifying organ dysfunction in sepsis (increase of ≥2 points = sepsis)[1]
- Generally used in the ICU; can stratify mortality based on initial score and subsequent changes
- Baseline SOFA score assumed to be 0 in patients without known pre-existing organ dysfunction
MEDS Score
- The Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) prediction rule is a proposed method to risk stratify ED patients with sepsis
- Has not gained widespread clinical adoption
NEWS 2 Score
- National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 determines degree of illness in non-pregnant patients ≥16 years old[6]
- Used by the UK NHS to identify acutely ill patients, including those with sepsis
- Not reliable in spinal cord injury patients due to disturbance of autonomic responses
- Combination of:
- Respiratory rate
- Presence of hypercapnic respiratory failure
- Presence of supplemental O₂
- Temperature
- SBP
- Pulse rate
- Consciousness (AVPU scale)
- See below for MDCalc link
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) Criteria
- Still acceptable to use in ED depending on local protocol
- Misses up to 1/8 very septic ICU patients[7]
- ≥2 of 4 criteria must be present:
- Temperature >38°C (100.4F) or <36°C (96.9F)
- HR >90 BPM
- RR >20 breaths/minute or PaCO2 <32 mmHg
- WBC count >12,000/mm3, <4,000/mm3, or >10% bands/immature forms
Clinical Features
Sepsis
Life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection.[1]
- Suspected infection with evidence of new organ dysfunction (SOFA increase ≥2), which may manifest as:
- Hypotension
- Altered mental status
- Tachypnea
- Oliguria
- Coagulopathy
- Elevated lactate
- Hypoxia
- Ileus
Septic shock
Patients with sepsis and both of the following despite adequate volume resuscitation:[1]
- Vasopressor requirement to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg AND
- Serum lactate level >2 mmol/L (>18 mg/dL)
Differential Diagnosis
- Adrenal Insufficiency
- Salicylate Toxicity
- Anticholinergic Toxicity
- Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
- Malignant Hyperthermia
- Thyrotoxicosis
Shock
- Cardiogenic
- Acute valvular Regurgitation/VSD
- CHF
- Dysrhythmia
- ACS
- Myocardial Contusion
- Myocarditis
- Drug toxicity (e.g. beta blocker, CCB, or bupropion OD)
- Obstructive
- Distributive
- Hypovolemic
- Severe dehydration
- Hemorrhagic shock (traumatic and non-traumatic)
Adrenal crisis
Evaluation
Work-Up
- CBC
- Urinalysis/Urine culture
- Blood culture (at least 2 sets, ideally before antibiotics but should not delay antibiotic administration)
- CXR
- Chem (BMP)
- LFTs
- Lipase
- VBG or ABG
- Lactate (re-measure within 2-4 hours if initially elevated)[4]
- Coags
- Consider:
- Procalcitonin (may help guide de-escalation of antibiotics; should not be used to withhold initial empiric antibiotics)
- DIC panel (fibrinogen, D-dimer, FDP)
- T&S
- CT head and/or LP
- TSH (thyroid storm)
- Cosyntropin stim vs. random cortisol (adrenal insufficiency)
- Pelvic exam (toxic shock syndrome, tampon)
- Influenza and respiratory viral testing
- CT Abd/Pelvis (abscess, other intra-abdominal source)
- Spine imaging (epidural abscess, other)
Management
Hour-1 Bundle
Time zero is the time of triage in the emergency department or the earliest documentation of sepsis-consistent elements. Sepsis and septic shock are medical emergencies; treatment and resuscitation should begin immediately.[4]
The Hour-1 Bundle should be viewed as a quality improvement target. Ideally all interventions begin in the first hour, though they may not all be completed within that time:
- Measure lactate level (re-measure within 2-4 hours if initial lactate >2 mmol/L)
- Obtain blood cultures prior to administration of antibiotics (but do not delay antibiotics to obtain cultures)
- Administer broad-spectrum antibiotics (see timing below)
- Begin rapid administration of 30 mL/kg crystalloid for hypotension or lactate ≥4 mmol/L
- Apply vasopressors if patient is hypotensive during or after fluid resuscitation to maintain MAP ≥65 mmHg
Antibiotic Timing (SSC 2021)
Timing is stratified by presence of shock and likelihood of infection:[4]
| Clinical Scenario | Antibiotic Timing |
| Septic shock or high likelihood of sepsis | Immediately, ideally within 1 hour of recognition (strong recommendation) |
| Possible sepsis without shock | Rapid assessment of infectious vs. non-infectious causes; within 3 hours if concern for infection persists (weak recommendation) |
| Alternative non-infectious diagnosis identified | Reassess; discontinue empiric antibiotics if infection is not confirmed[4] |
- See Initial Antibiotics in Sepsis (Main) for regimen selection
- Initial choice dependent on suspected source, local antibiogram, and severity of illness
- Prolonged (extended/continuous) infusions of beta-lactam antibiotics are suggested for maintenance therapy over conventional bolus infusions[4]
- Perform daily reassessment for antimicrobial de-escalation[4]
Source Control
- Identify and control the source of infection as soon as medically and logistically practical, ideally within 6-12 hours[4]
- Remove any infected lines or devices
- Drain abscesses
- Consult surgery or other specialists if indicated (e.g. for appendicitis, cholangitis, necrotizing fasciitis, etc.)
- Prolonged efforts at medical stabilization should not delay source control in severely ill patients
Circulation Management
IVF
- SSC 2021 suggests (downgraded from recommends in 2016) initial 30 mL/kg crystalloid for sepsis-induced hypoperfusion or septic shock, to be given within the first 3 hours[4]
- This is a starting point; some patients will need more, some less
- Reassess after each bolus — do not reflexively give the full 30 mL/kg without clinical reassessment
- Balanced crystalloids (e.g. Lactated Ringer's) are suggested over 0.9% normal saline (weak recommendation)[4]
- Use dynamic measures to guide ongoing fluid resuscitation (suggested over physical exam or static parameters alone):[4]
- Passive leg raise with assessment of stroke volume/cardiac output
- Fluid challenge with reassessment of hemodynamic response
- Stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation
- Bedside cardiovascular ultrasound (IVC ultrasound)
- Capillary refill time can be used to guide resuscitation as an adjunct to other measures[4]
- Lactate-guided resuscitation: Suggest targeting a decrease in lactate (re-measure q2-4h) as a marker of tissue perfusion[4]
- Increasing evidence that excessive fluid resuscitation can be harmful:
- Positive fluid balance on day 3 of hospital admission independently associated with increasing mortality[8]
- Protocolized fluid administration (i.e. traditional Early Goal Directed Therapy) has no mortality benefit over usual care[9][10]
- High volume (5+ L) resuscitation associated with increased mortality[11]
- Consider assessing diastolic dysfunction via echo in CHF patients in whom IVC ultrasound is not reliable
- CVP targets (>8 cmH₂O non-intubated, >12 cmH₂O intubated) are no longer recommended as resuscitation endpoints[4]
A central line and measurement of ScvO₂ is not required and does not impact mortality[12][13][14]
Pressors
- Indicated if MAP <65 despite initial fluid resuscitation, or if fluid resuscitation is contraindicated/unlikely to be sufficient
- Vasopressors may be started peripherally while central access is being obtained — do not delay initiation to place a central line[4]
- Target MAP ≥65 mmHg (SSC 2021 recommends an initial target of 65 mmHg over higher MAP targets)[4]
Options:
- Norepinephrine 0.1-1 mcg/kg/min (typical start 5-20 mcg/min) IV drip [15][4]
- Vasopressin 0.03 units/min (fixed dose) IV drip[4]
- SSC 2021 suggests adding vasopressin before epinephrine
- May reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation compared to catecholamine-only regimens[16]
- Epinephrine 1-20 mcg/min IV drip[4]
- Dopamine — should be used hesitantly and only in highly selected patients (e.g. patients with low risk of tachyarrhythmias and absolute or relative bradycardia)
- Do not use low-dose dopamine for renal protection
- Dopamine may have increased mortality rates compared to other vasopressors, especially in the pediatric septic patient[17]
- Phenylephrine — should not be used for treating septic shock except if:
- Norepinephrine is associated with serious arrhythmias
- Cardiac output is known to be high and blood pressure persistently low
- As salvage therapy when combined inotrope/vasopressor drugs and low-dose vasopressin have failed to achieve MAP target
- Methylene blue — consideration for septic shock refractory to catecholaminergic pressors (limited evidence)
Inotropes
- Dobutamine 2-20 mcg/kg/min IV drip may be added if:
- Myocardial dysfunction as suggested by elevated cardiac filling pressures and low cardiac output
- Ongoing signs of hypoperfusion despite achieving adequate intravascular volume and adequate MAP
- Note: Beta-2 agonism causes vasodilation; therefore needs to be used in conjunction with vasopressors
Steroids
- SSC 2021 suggests IV corticosteroids for adults with septic shock and an ongoing requirement for vasopressor therapy (weak recommendation)[4]
- The 2024 SCCM Focused Update further clarifies:[18]
- Suggests corticosteroids for adults with septic shock (conditional recommendation, low certainty)
- Recommends against high-dose/short-duration corticosteroids (>400 mg/day hydrocortisone equivalent for <3 days) (strong recommendation, moderate certainty)
- Dosing: Hydrocortisone 50 mg IV q6h (200 mg/day) IV
- Do not administer steroids for treatment of sepsis in the absence of shock
- Stress dose steroids are associated with faster time to shock resolution and faster ICU discharge[19]
- While stress dose steroids shorten recovery time, they have not been consistently shown to decrease overall mortality (though meta-analyses suggest a possible small benefit)[18]
- Newer meta-analyses do not show an increased incidence of superinfections related to initiation of stress dose steroids[20]
- Addition of fludrocortisone likely unnecessary as hydrocortisone has both glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid effects
- ACTH cosyntropin testing is likely unreliable in critically ill patients and should not guide the decision to give steroids
- Steroids are associated with adverse effects including hyperglycemia, hypernatremia, and neuromuscular weakness; weigh risks and benefits[21]
Esmolol
- One open-label, single-center RCT showing ~40% reduction in mortality when esmolol paired with norepinephrine infusion, with goal HR 80-95 BPM[22]
- All patients were fluid resuscitated, intubated, given hydrocortisone 300 mg/day
- Not standard of care — will require further multi-center RCTs to confirm findings; this result has not been replicated
Blood Products
RBCs
- Only transfuse RBCs when hemoglobin decreases to <7.0 g/dL (target 7.0–9.0 g/dL in adults)[4]
Erythropoietin
- Do not use erythropoietin as a specific treatment of anemia associated with severe sepsis
Platelets
- In severe sepsis, administer platelets prophylactically when counts are <10,000/mm³ (10 × 10⁹/L) in the absence of apparent bleeding
- If <20,000/mm³ (20 × 10⁹/L) and significant risk of bleeding, then administer platelets
- <50,000/mm³ (50 × 10⁹/L) if there is active bleeding, planned surgery, or other procedures
Disposition
- Admit, likely to step-down or ICU
- SSC 2021 suggests admitting patients with sepsis or septic shock who require ICU care within 6 hours of identification[4]
Calculators
qSOFA Score
| Criteria | No (0) | Yes (+1) |
|---|---|---|
| Altered mental status (GCS <15) | 0 | 1 |
| Respiratory rate ≥22 breaths/min | 0 | 1 |
| Systolic BP ≤100 mmHg | 0 | 1 |
| qSOFA Score | 0 / 3 | |
| Interpretation | |
|---|---|
| 0–1 | Low Risk — Not high risk for in-hospital mortality. Continue standard evaluation. |
| ≥2 | High Risk — Associated with ≥10% in-hospital mortality. Consider ICU-level care, lactate, blood cultures, and broad-spectrum antibiotics. |
| References |
|---|
|
SIRS Criteria
| Criteria | No (0) | Yes (+1) |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature >38°C (100.4°F) or <36°C (96.8°F) | 1 | |
| Heart rate >90 bpm | 1 | |
| Respiratory rate >20 breaths/min or PaCO₂ <32 mmHg | 1 | |
| WBC >12,000/mm³ or <4,000/mm³ or >10% bands | 1 | |
| SIRS Criteria Met | / 4 | |
| Interpretation | |
|---|---|
| 0–1 | SIRS criteria NOT met — Fewer than 2 criteria present. |
| ≥2 | SIRS criteria MET — If infection is suspected or confirmed, meets criteria for sepsis (per Sepsis-1/2 definition). Note: Sepsis-3 uses qSOFA/SOFA criteria instead. |
| References |
|---|
|
SOFA Score
| Organ System | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respiration (PaO₂/FiO₂) | 1 ≥400 | <400 | <300 | <200 + vent | <100 + vent |
| Coagulation (Platelets ×10³/µL) | 1 ≥150 | <150 | <100 | <50 | <20 |
| Liver (Bilirubin mg/dL) | 1 <1.2 | 1.2–1.9 | 2.0–5.9 | 6.0–11.9 | >12 |
| Cardiovascular | 1 MAP≥70 | MAP<70 | Dopa ≤5 | Dopa>5/Epi≤0.1 | Dopa>15/Epi>0.1 |
| CNS (GCS) | 1 15 | 13–14 | 10–12 | 6–9 | <6 |
| Renal (Cr mg/dL or UO) | 1 <1.2 | 1.2–1.9 | 2.0–3.4 | 3.5–4.9/<500mL/d | >5.0/<200mL/d |
| SOFA Score | / 24 | ||||
| 0–6 | <10% mortality |
|---|---|
| 7–9 | 15–20% mortality |
| 10–12 | 40–50% mortality |
| 13–14 | 50–60% mortality |
| ≥15 | >80% mortality. SOFA ≥2 = organ dysfunction (Sepsis-3 definition). |
|
External Links
- MDCalc - SIRS, Sepsis, and Septic Shock Criteria
- MDCalc - qSOFA Score
- MDCalc - NEWS 2
- EMCrit Sepsis 3.0
- SSC 2021 Guidelines (Full Text)
See Also
- Initial Antibiotics in Sepsis (Main)
- Sepsis (Peds)
- EBQ:ProCESS Trial
- Quick Sequential (Sepsis Related) Organ Failure Assessment Score (qSOFA)
- Pneumonia (main)
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Singer, Mervyn et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287
- ↑ Jui, Jonathan (2011). "Ch. 146: Septic Shock". In Tintinalli, Judith E.; Stapczynski, J. Stephan; Ma, O. John; Cline, David M. et al. Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 1003–14.
- ↑ Munford, Robert S.; Suffredini, Anthony F. (2014). "Ch. 75: Sepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock". In Bennett, John E.; Dolin, Raphael; Blaser, Martin J.. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences. pp. 914–34.
- ↑ 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 4.21 4.22 4.23 Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1063-e1143.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Seymour C. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):762-774. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
- ↑ Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2: Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Updated report of a working party. London: RCP, 2017.
- ↑ Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Bellomo R. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria for Severe Sepsis. The New England journal of medicine. 373(9):881. 2015.
- ↑ Sakr Y et al. Higher Fluid Balance Increases the Risk of Death From Sepsis: Results From a Large International Audit. Critical care medicine. 45(3):386-394, Mar 2017.
- ↑ Yealy DM, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1683-93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602
- ↑ Mouncey PR, et al. Trial of Early, Goal-Directed Resuscitation for Septic Shock. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1301-11. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896
- ↑ Marik PE, et al. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med (2017) 43:625–632 DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y
- ↑ ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Juang DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370(18):1683-1693. Full Text
- ↑ The ARISE Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1496-1506.
- ↑ Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al for the ProMISe trial investigators. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015:DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896.
- ↑ EBQ:SOAP II Trial
- ↑ McIntyre WF, Um KJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Association of Vasopressin Plus Catecholamine Vasopressors vs Catecholamines Alone With Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Distributive Shock. JAMA. 2018;319(18):1889.
- ↑ Ventura AM, Shieh HH, Bousso A, et al. Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Dopamine Versus Epinephrine as First-Line Vasoactive Drugs in Pediatric Septic Shock. Crit Care Med 2015;43:2292-302.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Chaudhuri D, Nei AM, Rochwerg B, et al. 2024 Focused Update: Guidelines on Use of Corticosteroids in Sepsis, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, and Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2024;52(5):e219-e233.
- ↑ Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J, et al; ADRENAL Trial Investigators. Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):797-808.
- ↑ Sligl WI, Milner DA Jr, Sundar S, Mphatswe W, Majumdar SR. Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids for the treatment of septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1;49(1):93-101.
- ↑ Pitre T, Drover K, Chaudhuri D, et al. Corticosteroids in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review, Pairwise, and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Explor. 2024;6(1):e1000.
- ↑ Andrea Morelli et al. Effect of Heart Rate Control With Esmolol on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2013;310(16):1683-1691.
