Sepsis (main)

(Redirigido desde «Sepsis (Main)»)

This page is for adult patients. For pediatric patients, see: Sepsis (peds)

Background

  • Sepsis should be defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection[1]
  • The infection is most commonly by bacteria, but can also be by fungi, viruses, or parasites[2]
  • The most common primary sources of infection resulting in sepsis are the lungs, the abdomen, and the urinary tract[3]
  • Sepsis and septic shock are major healthcare problems, killing between one in three and one in six of those affected[4]
  • In-hospital mortality for septic shock is approximately 30-40%[4]
  • Positive cultures are not obligatory in the diagnosis of sepsis
  • Pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections, and pyelonephritis are the most common primary causes

Sepsis-3 Definitions (2016)

In 2016 new definitions were adopted for the evaluation and diagnosis of Sepsis and Septic Shock[5]

Old Definition Sepsis-3 Definition (2016)
Sepsis 2 SIRS criteria + suspected infection Life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, operationalized as:
  • Suspected/documented infection PLUS
  • Increase in SOFA score by ≥2 points
Severe Sepsis Sepsis + organ dysfunction:
  • SBP <90, or
  • MAP <65, or
  • Lactate >2, or
  • INR >1.5, or
  • Bili >2, or
  • Urine output <0.5 mL/kg/hr, or
  • Creatinine >2.0, or
  • Platelets <100, or
  • SpO₂ <90%
No longer a category (subsumed into "sepsis," which now requires organ dysfunction by definition)
Septic Shock Sepsis + hypotension after adequate fluid resuscitation Sepsis PLUS:
  • Vasopressors needed to maintain MAP ≥65 AND
  • Lactate >2 mmol/L (>18 mg/dL) despite adequate volume resuscitation

qSOFA (Bedside Screening Tool)

The qSOFA was proposed as a bedside screening tool to identify patients outside the ICU who may have sepsis. It is not the definition of sepsis.[5]

SSC 2021 recommends against using qSOFA as a single screening tool for sepsis or septic shock, as it has poor sensitivity; however, it may prompt further workup when positive.[4]

qSOFA Score

Quick Sequential (Sepsis Related) Organ Failure Assessment Score

  • Respiratory rate of 22/min or greater (+1 Point)
  • Altered mentation (+1 Point)
  • Systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or less (+1 Point)
  • qSOFA ≥2 should prompt:
    • Consideration of possible sepsis
    • Initiation of workup (cultures, lactate, imaging)
    • Assessment for organ dysfunction (formal SOFA score)
  • A qSOFA <2 does not rule out sepsis

SOFA Score

  • The SOFA score is the formal tool for identifying organ dysfunction in sepsis (increase of ≥2 points = sepsis)[1]
  • Generally used in the ICU; can stratify mortality based on initial score and subsequent changes
  • Baseline SOFA score assumed to be 0 in patients without known pre-existing organ dysfunction

MEDS Score

  • The Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) prediction rule is a proposed method to risk stratify ED patients with sepsis
  • Has not gained widespread clinical adoption

NEWS 2 Score

  • National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2 determines degree of illness in non-pregnant patients ≥16 years old[6]
  • Used by the UK NHS to identify acutely ill patients, including those with sepsis
  • Not reliable in spinal cord injury patients due to disturbance of autonomic responses
  • Combination of:
    • Respiratory rate
    • Presence of hypercapnic respiratory failure
    • Presence of supplemental O₂
    • Temperature
    • SBP
    • Pulse rate
    • Consciousness (AVPU scale)
  • See below for MDCalc link

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) Criteria

  • Still acceptable to use in ED depending on local protocol
  • Misses up to 1/8 very septic ICU patients[7]


  • ≥2 of 4 criteria must be present:
  1. Temperature >38°C (100.4F) or <36°C (96.9F)
  2. HR >90 BPM
  3. RR >20 breaths/minute or PaCO2 <32 mmHg
  4. WBC count >12,000/mm3, <4,000/mm3, or >10% bands/immature forms

Clinical Features

Sepsis

Life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection.[1]

Septic shock

Patients with sepsis and both of the following despite adequate volume resuscitation:[1]

  1. Vasopressor requirement to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg AND
  2. Serum lactate level >2 mmol/L (>18 mg/dL)

Differential Diagnosis

Shock


Adrenal crisis

Evaluation

Work-Up

Management

Hour-1 Bundle

Time zero is the time of triage in the emergency department or the earliest documentation of sepsis-consistent elements. Sepsis and septic shock are medical emergencies; treatment and resuscitation should begin immediately.[4]

The Hour-1 Bundle should be viewed as a quality improvement target. Ideally all interventions begin in the first hour, though they may not all be completed within that time:

  1. Measure lactate level (re-measure within 2-4 hours if initial lactate >2 mmol/L)
  2. Obtain blood cultures prior to administration of antibiotics (but do not delay antibiotics to obtain cultures)
  3. Administer broad-spectrum antibiotics (see timing below)
  4. Begin rapid administration of 30 mL/kg crystalloid for hypotension or lactate ≥4 mmol/L
  5. Apply vasopressors if patient is hypotensive during or after fluid resuscitation to maintain MAP ≥65 mmHg

Antibiotic Timing (SSC 2021)

Timing is stratified by presence of shock and likelihood of infection:[4]

Clinical Scenario Antibiotic Timing
Septic shock or high likelihood of sepsis Immediately, ideally within 1 hour of recognition (strong recommendation)
Possible sepsis without shock Rapid assessment of infectious vs. non-infectious causes; within 3 hours if concern for infection persists (weak recommendation)
Alternative non-infectious diagnosis identified Reassess; discontinue empiric antibiotics if infection is not confirmed[4]
  • See Initial Antibiotics in Sepsis (Main) for regimen selection
  • Initial choice dependent on suspected source, local antibiogram, and severity of illness
  • Prolonged (extended/continuous) infusions of beta-lactam antibiotics are suggested for maintenance therapy over conventional bolus infusions[4]
  • Perform daily reassessment for antimicrobial de-escalation[4]

Source Control

  • Identify and control the source of infection as soon as medically and logistically practical, ideally within 6-12 hours[4]
  • Remove any infected lines or devices
  • Drain abscesses
  • Consult surgery or other specialists if indicated (e.g. for appendicitis, cholangitis, necrotizing fasciitis, etc.)
  • Prolonged efforts at medical stabilization should not delay source control in severely ill patients

Circulation Management

IVF

  • SSC 2021 suggests (downgraded from recommends in 2016) initial 30 mL/kg crystalloid for sepsis-induced hypoperfusion or septic shock, to be given within the first 3 hours[4]
    • This is a starting point; some patients will need more, some less
    • Reassess after each bolus — do not reflexively give the full 30 mL/kg without clinical reassessment
  • Balanced crystalloids (e.g. Lactated Ringer's) are suggested over 0.9% normal saline (weak recommendation)[4]
  • Use dynamic measures to guide ongoing fluid resuscitation (suggested over physical exam or static parameters alone):[4]
    • Passive leg raise with assessment of stroke volume/cardiac output
    • Fluid challenge with reassessment of hemodynamic response
    • Stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation
    • Bedside cardiovascular ultrasound (IVC ultrasound)
  • Capillary refill time can be used to guide resuscitation as an adjunct to other measures[4]
  • Lactate-guided resuscitation: Suggest targeting a decrease in lactate (re-measure q2-4h) as a marker of tissue perfusion[4]
  • Increasing evidence that excessive fluid resuscitation can be harmful:
    • Positive fluid balance on day 3 of hospital admission independently associated with increasing mortality[8]
    • Protocolized fluid administration (i.e. traditional Early Goal Directed Therapy) has no mortality benefit over usual care[9][10]
    • High volume (5+ L) resuscitation associated with increased mortality[11]
  • Consider assessing diastolic dysfunction via echo in CHF patients in whom IVC ultrasound is not reliable
  • CVP targets (>8 cmH₂O non-intubated, >12 cmH₂O intubated) are no longer recommended as resuscitation endpoints[4]

A central line and measurement of ScvO₂ is not required and does not impact mortality[12][13][14]

Pressors

  • Indicated if MAP <65 despite initial fluid resuscitation, or if fluid resuscitation is contraindicated/unlikely to be sufficient
  • Vasopressors may be started peripherally while central access is being obtained — do not delay initiation to place a central line[4]
  • Target MAP ≥65 mmHg (SSC 2021 recommends an initial target of 65 mmHg over higher MAP targets)[4]

Options:

  • Norepinephrine 0.1-1 mcg/kg/min (typical start 5-20 mcg/min) IV drip [15][4]
  • Vasopressin 0.03 units/min (fixed dose) IV drip[4]
    • SSC 2021 suggests adding vasopressin before epinephrine
    • May reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation compared to catecholamine-only regimens[16]
  • Epinephrine 1-20 mcg/min IV drip[4]
  • Dopamine — should be used hesitantly and only in highly selected patients (e.g. patients with low risk of tachyarrhythmias and absolute or relative bradycardia)
    • Do not use low-dose dopamine for renal protection
    • Dopamine may have increased mortality rates compared to other vasopressors, especially in the pediatric septic patient[17]
  • Phenylephrine — should not be used for treating septic shock except if:
    • Norepinephrine is associated with serious arrhythmias
    • Cardiac output is known to be high and blood pressure persistently low
    • As salvage therapy when combined inotrope/vasopressor drugs and low-dose vasopressin have failed to achieve MAP target
  • Methylene blue — consideration for septic shock refractory to catecholaminergic pressors (limited evidence)

Inotropes

  • Dobutamine 2-20 mcg/kg/min IV drip may be added if:
    • Myocardial dysfunction as suggested by elevated cardiac filling pressures and low cardiac output
    • Ongoing signs of hypoperfusion despite achieving adequate intravascular volume and adequate MAP
    • Note: Beta-2 agonism causes vasodilation; therefore needs to be used in conjunction with vasopressors

Steroids

  • SSC 2021 suggests IV corticosteroids for adults with septic shock and an ongoing requirement for vasopressor therapy (weak recommendation)[4]
  • The 2024 SCCM Focused Update further clarifies:[18]
    • Suggests corticosteroids for adults with septic shock (conditional recommendation, low certainty)
    • Recommends against high-dose/short-duration corticosteroids (>400 mg/day hydrocortisone equivalent for <3 days) (strong recommendation, moderate certainty)
  • Dosing: Hydrocortisone 50 mg IV q6h (200 mg/day) IV
  • Do not administer steroids for treatment of sepsis in the absence of shock
  • Stress dose steroids are associated with faster time to shock resolution and faster ICU discharge[19]
  • While stress dose steroids shorten recovery time, they have not been consistently shown to decrease overall mortality (though meta-analyses suggest a possible small benefit)[18]
  • Newer meta-analyses do not show an increased incidence of superinfections related to initiation of stress dose steroids[20]
  • Addition of fludrocortisone likely unnecessary as hydrocortisone has both glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid effects
  • ACTH cosyntropin testing is likely unreliable in critically ill patients and should not guide the decision to give steroids
  • Steroids are associated with adverse effects including hyperglycemia, hypernatremia, and neuromuscular weakness; weigh risks and benefits[21]

Esmolol

  • One open-label, single-center RCT showing ~40% reduction in mortality when esmolol paired with norepinephrine infusion, with goal HR 80-95 BPM[22]
  • All patients were fluid resuscitated, intubated, given hydrocortisone 300 mg/day
  • Not standard of care — will require further multi-center RCTs to confirm findings; this result has not been replicated

Blood Products

RBCs

  • Only transfuse RBCs when hemoglobin decreases to <7.0 g/dL (target 7.0–9.0 g/dL in adults)[4]

Erythropoietin

  • Do not use erythropoietin as a specific treatment of anemia associated with severe sepsis

Platelets

  • In severe sepsis, administer platelets prophylactically when counts are <10,000/mm³ (10 × 10⁹/L) in the absence of apparent bleeding
  • If <20,000/mm³ (20 × 10⁹/L) and significant risk of bleeding, then administer platelets
  • <50,000/mm³ (50 × 10⁹/L) if there is active bleeding, planned surgery, or other procedures

Disposition

  • Admit, likely to step-down or ICU
  • SSC 2021 suggests admitting patients with sepsis or septic shock who require ICU care within 6 hours of identification[4]

Calculators

qSOFA Score

qSOFA (Quick SOFA) Score
Criteria No (0) Yes (+1)
Altered mental status (GCS <15) 0 1
Respiratory rate ≥22 breaths/min 0 1
Systolic BP ≤100 mmHg 0 1
qSOFA Score 0   / 3
Interpretation
0–1 Low Risk — Not high risk for in-hospital mortality. Continue standard evaluation.
≥2 High Risk — Associated with ≥10% in-hospital mortality. Consider ICU-level care, lactate, blood cultures, and broad-spectrum antibiotics.
References
  • Singer M et al. Sepsis-3 Definitions. JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. PMID 26903338.
  • Seymour CW et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis. JAMA. 2016;315(8):762-774. PMID 26903335.

SIRS Criteria

SIRS Criteria
Criteria No (0) Yes (+1)
Temperature >38°C (100.4°F) or <36°C (96.8°F) 1
Heart rate >90 bpm 1
Respiratory rate >20 breaths/min or PaCO₂ <32 mmHg 1
WBC >12,000/mm³ or <4,000/mm³ or >10% bands 1
SIRS Criteria Met / 4
Interpretation
0–1 SIRS criteria NOT met — Fewer than 2 criteria present.
≥2 SIRS criteria MET — If infection is suspected or confirmed, meets criteria for sepsis (per Sepsis-1/2 definition). Note: Sepsis-3 uses qSOFA/SOFA criteria instead.
References
  • Bone RC et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure. Chest. 1992;101:1644-1655. PMID 1303622.
  • Kaukonen KM et al. SIRS criteria in defining severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1629-1638. PMID 25776936.


SOFA Score

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
Organ System 0 1 2 3 4
Respiration (PaO₂/FiO₂) 1 ≥400 <400 <300 <200 + vent <100 + vent
Coagulation (Platelets ×10³/µL) 1 ≥150 <150 <100 <50 <20
Liver (Bilirubin mg/dL) 1 <1.2 1.2–1.9 2.0–5.9 6.0–11.9 >12
Cardiovascular 1 MAP≥70 MAP<70 Dopa ≤5 Dopa>5/Epi≤0.1 Dopa>15/Epi>0.1
CNS (GCS) 1 15 13–14 10–12 6–9 <6
Renal (Cr mg/dL or UO) 1 <1.2 1.2–1.9 2.0–3.4 3.5–4.9/<500mL/d >5.0/<200mL/d
SOFA Score / 24
Interpretation — ICU Mortality
0–6 <10% mortality
7–9 15–20% mortality
10–12 40–50% mortality
13–14 50–60% mortality
≥15 >80% mortality. SOFA ≥2 = organ dysfunction (Sepsis-3 definition).
References
  • Vincent JL, et al. The SOFA score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707-710. PMID 8844239.
  • Singer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. PMID 26903338.

External Links

See Also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Singer, Mervyn et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287
  2. Jui, Jonathan (2011). "Ch. 146: Septic Shock". In Tintinalli, Judith E.; Stapczynski, J. Stephan; Ma, O. John; Cline, David M. et al. Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 1003–14.
  3. Munford, Robert S.; Suffredini, Anthony F. (2014). "Ch. 75: Sepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock". In Bennett, John E.; Dolin, Raphael; Blaser, Martin J.. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences. pp. 914–34.
  4. 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 4.21 4.22 4.23 Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1063-e1143.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Seymour C. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):762-774. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
  6. Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2: Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Updated report of a working party. London: RCP, 2017.
  7. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Bellomo R. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria for Severe Sepsis. The New England journal of medicine. 373(9):881. 2015.
  8. Sakr Y et al. Higher Fluid Balance Increases the Risk of Death From Sepsis: Results From a Large International Audit. Critical care medicine. 45(3):386-394, Mar 2017.
  9. Yealy DM, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1683-93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602
  10. Mouncey PR, et al. Trial of Early, Goal-Directed Resuscitation for Septic Shock. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1301-11. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896
  11. Marik PE, et al. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med (2017) 43:625–632 DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y
  12. ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Juang DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370(18):1683-1693. Full Text
  13. The ARISE Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1496-1506.
  14. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al for the ProMISe trial investigators. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015:DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896.
  15. EBQ:SOAP II Trial
  16. McIntyre WF, Um KJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Association of Vasopressin Plus Catecholamine Vasopressors vs Catecholamines Alone With Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Distributive Shock. JAMA. 2018;319(18):1889.
  17. Ventura AM, Shieh HH, Bousso A, et al. Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Dopamine Versus Epinephrine as First-Line Vasoactive Drugs in Pediatric Septic Shock. Crit Care Med 2015;43:2292-302.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Chaudhuri D, Nei AM, Rochwerg B, et al. 2024 Focused Update: Guidelines on Use of Corticosteroids in Sepsis, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, and Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2024;52(5):e219-e233.
  19. Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J, et al; ADRENAL Trial Investigators. Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):797-808.
  20. Sligl WI, Milner DA Jr, Sundar S, Mphatswe W, Majumdar SR. Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids for the treatment of septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1;49(1):93-101.
  21. Pitre T, Drover K, Chaudhuri D, et al. Corticosteroids in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review, Pairwise, and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Explor. 2024;6(1):e1000.
  22. Andrea Morelli et al. Effect of Heart Rate Control With Esmolol on Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2013;310(16):1683-1691.