Diferencia entre revisiones de «HIV post-exposure prophylaxis»

Sin resumen de edición
Línea 12: Línea 12:
==Diagnosis==
==Diagnosis==
===Exposure Transmission Risk===
===Exposure Transmission Risk===
{| style="width: 500px" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
| '''Exposure^'''<br/>
| '''Exposure^'''<br/>

Revisión del 17:22 19 may 2015

Background

  • Probability of HIV transmission from a percutaneous needle stick is approximately 0.3% and 0.09% from mucous membrane exposure.[1][2]
  • Also known as HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)
  • ~79% transmission reduction
  • Initiate ASAP (goal = <2 hours after exposure)
  • >36 hours: normally deferred, unless particularly high risk
  • Common side-effects = constitutional, gastrointestinal

National Clinician's Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Hotline

  • 1-888-448-4911, call for expert advice

Diagnosis

Exposure Transmission Risk

Exposure^
Risk
Percutaneous 0.3%
Mucocutaneous 0.09%
Needle-sharing injection drug 0.7%
Receptive anal intercourse 0.5%
Receptive penile-vaginal intercourse 0.1%
Insertive anal intercourse 0.07%
Insertive penile-vaginal intercourse 0.05%
Receptive oral (male) intercourse 0.01%
Insertive oral (male) intercourse 0.005%

^assumes no condom use

High Risk Exposures

Source

  1. Symptomatic HIV/AIDS
  2. Acute seroconversion
  3. High viral load

Exposure

  1. Deep injuries
  2. Visible blood on device
  3. Injuries sustained placing a catheter in a vein/artery

Workup (Before Giving)

  • CBC
  • C7
  • LFTs
  • Pregnancy test

Management

  • CDC recommendations as of 2013:[3]
  1. PEP is recommended when occupational exposures to HIV occur
  2. HIV status of the exposure source patient should be determined, if possible, to guide need for HIV PEP
  3. PEP medication regimens should be started as soon as possible after occupational exposure to HIV, and continued for a 4-week duration
  4. New recommendation - PEP medication regimens should contain 3 (or more) antiretroviral drugs for all occupational exposures to HIV
  5. Expert consultation is recommended for any occupational exposures to HIV a
  6. Close follow-up for exposed personnel should be provided that includes
    1. Counseling
    2. Baseline and follow-up HIV testing
    3. Monitoring for drug toxicity
    4. Follow-up appointments should begin within 72 hours of an HIV exposure
  7. New recommendation - if a newer fourth-generation combination HIV p24 antigen-HIV antibody test is utilized for follow-up HIV testing of exposed HCP, HIV testing may be concluded 4 months after exposure; if a newer testing platform is not available, follow-up HIV testing is typically concluded 6 months after an HIV exposure.

Negligible Risk

  • NOT recommended

Substantial Risk

  • CDC preferred regimen for 28 days:^[4]
    • Raltegravir (isentress) 400 mg PO twice daily, plus
    • Truvada (tenofovir 300 mg + emtricitabine 200 mg) 1 PO once daily
  • If known source patient with resistant HIV strain, consult HIV service for source-patient-specific PEP

^Consider interactions with current medication interactions and contraindications, such as renal impairment with Truvada

Pregnant Patients

  • Same as above

See Also

Source

  1. Marcus R. et al. CDC Cooperative Needlestick Surveillance Group. "Surveillance of health care workers exposed to blood from patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus". N Engl J Med. 1988. 319: 1118–1123.
  2. Bell D.M. "Occupational risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in healthcare workers: an overview". Am J Med. 1997. 102: 9–15.
  3. Kuhar DT et al. Updated US Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to human immunodeficiency virus and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):875-92. doi: 10.1086/672271.
  4. Updated US Public Health Service Guidelines for the Management of Occupational Exposures to Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Recommendations for Postexposure Prophylaxis. August 6, 2013. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/672271 DOI: 10.1086/672271