Diferencia entre revisiones de «EBQ:AFFIRM»
Sin resumen de edición |
(AFFIRM) |
||
| Línea 25: | Línea 25: | ||
==Study Design== | ==Study Design== | ||
*Multicenter, randomized controlled trial | |||
==Population== | ==Population== | ||
===Patient Demographics=== | ===Patient Demographics=== | ||
Revisión del 23:56 16 oct 2014
incomplete Journal Club Article
Wyse DG, et al. "A Comparison of Rate Control and Rhythm Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation". NEJM. 2002. 347(23):1825-1833.
PubMed Full text PDF
PubMed Full text PDF
Clinical Question
Which is better for treating atrial fibrillation, rate control allowing Afib at a lower heart rate, or rhythm control by maintaining sinus rhythm?
Conclusion
Rhythm control for Afib offers no survival advantage over rate control, and rate control is potentially advantageous given the lower risk of adverse drug reactions with rhythm control medications.
Major Points
Study Design
- Multicenter, randomized controlled trial