Diferencia entre revisiones de «Template:Wells PE Calculator»

(Add references to Wells PE calculator)
(Add === Wells Score for PE === subheading for TOC visibility)
Línea 5: Línea 5:


[[Category:Calculator templates]]
[[Category:Calculator templates]]
</noinclude><div class="calculator-container" data-calculator-refresh-on-load="true">
</noinclude>=== Wells Score for PE ===
<div class="calculator-container" data-calculator-refresh-on-load="true">
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; border-collapse:collapse;"
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; border-collapse:collapse;"
|+ style="font-size:16px; font-weight:bold; padding:8px; background:#8e44ad; color:white;" | Wells' PE Score Calculator
|+ style="font-size:16px; font-weight:bold; padding:8px; background:#8e44ad; color:white;" | Wells' PE Score Calculator

Revisión del 15:51 21 mar 2026

Interactive Wells' Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism calculator. Requires the calculator gadget.

Usage: {{Wells PE Calculator}}

Wells Score for PE

Wells' PE Score Calculator
Criteria No Yes Points
Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT (leg swelling, pain with palpation) 1 +3.0
PE is #1 diagnosis OR equally likely 1 +3.0
Heart rate >100 bpm 1 +1.5
Immobilization (≥3 days) OR surgery in previous 4 weeks 1 +1.5
Previous objectively diagnosed PE or DVT 1 +1.5
Hemoptysis 1 +1.0
Malignancy (treatment within 6 months or palliative) 1 +1.0
Wells' Score points
Three-Tier Model
0–1 Low Risk — 1.3% incidence of PE. Consider D-dimer to rule out. Consider PERC rule.
2–6 Moderate Risk — 16.2% incidence of PE. Consider high-sensitivity D-dimer or CTA.
>6 High Risk — 37.5% incidence of PE. Consider CTA. D-dimer not recommended.
Two-Tier Model (Preferred by guidelines)
0–4 PE Unlikely — 12.1% incidence. Consider high-sensitivity D-dimer; if negative, stop workup.
>4 PE Likely — 37.1% incidence. Consider CTA testing.
References
  • Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416-420. PMID 10744147.
  • van Belle A, Büller HR, Huisman MV, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006;295(2):172-179. PMID 16403929.