Diferencia entre revisiones de «Transient ischemic attack»

Sin resumen de edición
(Move calculators to own section with header (visible in TOC), expanded, before External Links)
 
(No se muestran 94 ediciones intermedias de 14 usuarios)
Línea 1: Línea 1:
==Definition==
"Transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord, or retinal ischemia without infarction.” Stroke 2009;40[6]:2276
==Background==
==Background==
*Abbreviation: TIA
*'''New Definition:''' a brief episode of neurologic dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord or retinal ischemia, with clinical symptoms typically lasting less than one hour, and without evidence of acute infarction. <ref name="Albers">Albers GW, et al. The TIA Working Group. Transient ischemic attack: proposal for a new definition. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1713–1716.</ref>
**Should be viewed as analogous to unstable angina
*'''Classic Definition:'''  A sudden, focal neurologic deficit that lasts for less than 24 hours, is presumed to be of vascular origin, and is confined to an area of the brain or eye perfused by a specific artery<ref name="Albers"></ref>
*Since 15% of strokes are preceded by TIA, timely eval of high risk conditions like [[Atrial Fibrillation]] and [[Carotid stenosis|Carotid Stenosis]] is important


1. Ischemic
==Clinical Features==
* Thrombosis
*Focal [[weakness]] (Paralysis or paresis of the face, arm, or leg and typically unilateral)
* Vasculitis
*[[Dysarthria]] or dysphasia or aphasia
* Dissection
*[[visual disturbances|Vision changes]] (Field deficits, [[vision loss|blindness]], or [[diplopia]])
2. Embolic
*Changes in balance or [[ataxia|coordination]]
* Cardiac
* Carotids
3. Vasospasm
4. Hypotension/watershed


DDx==
==Differential Diagnosis==
* Hypoglycemia
{{Stroke DDX}}
* Infectious endocarditis
* Complex migraines
* Peripheral cranial nerve lesions
* Seizure
==Work-Up==


* Head CT
==Evaluation==
* Labs
{{Stroke workup}}
** CBC
** Chemistry
** Coags
* ECG (a-fib)
* CXR
* ?MRI/MRA or ?Neuro labs (ESR?, lipids?)


==Treatment==
==Management==
*Little acute management (given normally resolution of symptoms)
*Consider [[Aspirin]] 325 mg PO (once hemorrhage ruled-out) for low risk TIA (ABCD2 score < 4)
*Consider dual [[antiplatelet]] therapy for high risk TIA (ABCD2 score ≥ 4)<ref>Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, Barsan W, Conwit RA, Elm JJ, Kim AS, Lindblad AS, Palesch YY. Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk TIA. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):215-225.</ref>
**Load with [[Aspirin]] 325 mg chewed, followed by ASA 81 mg PO daily
**Load with [[Clopidogrel]] 300 mg PO followed by 75 mg daily for 3 weeks only


* Head of bed lowered
==Medication Dosing==
* Permissive hypertension
{{MedicationDose
* NS 500cc bolus, then 150cc/hr (non-CHF/fluid overloaded)
| drug = Aspirin
* ASA
| dose = 325mg chewed, then 81mg PO daily
* Heparin if cardiac embolic source/a-fib (usually different vascular territories)
| route = PO
| context = Antiplatelet, all TIA patients
| indication = Transient ischemic attack
| population = Adult
}}
{{MedicationDose
| drug = Clopidogrel
| dose = 300mg PO load, then 75mg daily x 3 weeks
| route = PO
| context = Dual antiplatelet for high-risk TIA (ABCD2 >= 4)
| indication = Transient ischemic attack
| population = Adult
}}


==Disposition==
==Disposition==
===ACEP Guidelines<ref name="ACEP"></ref>===
*Level B: In adult patients with suspected TIA, do not rely on current existing risk stratification instruments (eg, age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA and presence of diabetes [ABCD2] score) to identify TIA patients who can be safely discharged from the ED.
**In contrast to the 2009 AHA/ASA recommendations that were based on limited research, the ABCD2 does not sufficiently identify the short-term risk for stroke to use alone as a risk-stratification instrument.
**Multiple other risk-stratification instruments have been evaluated less frequently than the ABCD2 score. None have demonstrated the ability to identify individual patients at sufficiently low short-term risk for stroke to use alone as a risk-stratification instrument.
*Level B: A rapid ED based diagnostic protocol can be used to safely identify patients at short-term risk for stroke.
**Study based on observation units and outpatient TIA clinics<ref>Ross MA, Compton S, Medado P, et al. An emergency department diagnostic protocol for patients with transient ischemic attack: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50:109-119</ref>
[[File:TIA ADP.png|thumbnail|Example of a rapid ED protocol for TIA]]


ABCD2 SCORE
==Prognosis==
 
Age > 60 (1 pt)
Blood pressure (SBP >140 or diastolic >90) (1 pt)
Clinical
* unilateral weakness (2 pt)
* speech disturbance without weakness (1 pt)
* Duration symptoms 10-60 min (1 pt)
* Duration symptoms >60 min (2 pt)
* Diabetes (1 pt)
Admit for score >3 and presenting within 72h of symptoms
 
(none with less had CVA within one week in study)
 
Only numbness with low score is low risk: outpt f/u with Neuro
 
Also admit:
 
Crescendo TIA
Duration >1h
Symptomatic carotid stenosis > 50%
Known cardiac source of embolus
Known hypercoaguable state
 
Literature:
 
Johnston, SC et al.  JAMA.  Dec 13, 2000.
 
    To determine which pts need to be admitted vs rapid outpatient evaluation.
 
    10% of pts with TIA developed CVA within 90 days.
 
    50% (5%) within 2 days.
 
 
Kaiser Study
 
    Greater risk of CVA (admit any)
 
1.  Age >60
 
2.  DM
 
3.  Duration >10min
 
4.  Motor weakness
 
5.  Speech impairment (dysarthria/ aphasia)
 
 
Numbness is low risk:  outpt f/u with Neuro
 
(also, at increased risk of CVA if >4 TIA spells within last 2 wks, or escalating / crescendo TIA)
 
Transient monocular blindness (amaurosis fugax) more benign.
 
 
 
in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Nov 1994.  33% of pts with TIA will have CVA within 5 yrs.
 
    high risk... inpt w/u
 
    low risk... expedited outpt w/u
 
    ECG for a-fib
 
    Echocardiogram, TEE most sensitive.  prosthetic valves... DCM... mural thrombosis, SBE, post-MI.
 
    Carotid duplex, if +, cerebral angiogram, then CEA.
 
    ----ASA
 
    ----Heparin if cardiac embolic source/a-fib.  usually different vascular territories.
 
    ----if ASA intolerant or ASA failure, then Ticlopidine.  consider Coumadin.
 
    or,        Plavix alone. 
 


TIA ADMIT (nmlly neg sy; <1hr)
===Canadian TIA Score===
*The score offers better performance than ABCD2 in predicting stroke risk after TIA, particularly low risk. <ref>Perry JJ et al. Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study.BMJ 2021 Feb 4.</ref>
'''Item Scoring'''
*Clinical Findings:
**1. First TIA (in lifetime) (2 pt)
**2. Symptoms ≥10 minutes (2 pt)
**3. Past history of carotid stenosis (2 pt)
**4. Already on antiplatelet therapy (3 pt)
**5. History of gait disturbance (1 pt)
**6. History of unilateral weakness (1 pt)
**7. History of vertigo (-3 pts)
**8. Initial triage diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg (3 pt)
**9. Dysarthria or aphasia (history or examination) (3 pt)


1) any Johnson criteria
*Investigations in the emergency department:
**1.Atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram (2 pt)
**2.Infarction (new or old) on computed tomography (1 pt)
**3.Platelet count≥400×109/L (2 pt)
**4.Glucose ≥15 mmol/L (3pt)


2) <1 wk from onset
{| class="wikitable"
|-
| '''Points'''
| '''Stroke Risk'''
| '''Risk of Stroke or Carotid Revascularization in 7 Days''' 
|-
| -3-3
| Low
| .5%
|-
| 4-8
| Medium Risk
| 2.3%
|-
| ≥9
| High
| 5.9%
|}


===ABCD2 Score<ref>Johnston SC, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack.Lancet. 2007; 369(9558):283-92.</ref>===
*Risk of stroke at 2d, 7d, and 90d from TIA
*Although prognostic, evidence-based admission thresholds have not been determined
*None with score <3 had CVA within one week in study
*Studies have failed to validate the ABCD2 score, and may cause physicians to incorrectly classify ~8% of patients as low risk, with sensitivity of the score for high risk patients only ~30%<ref>Stead LG, Suravaram S. An assessment of the incremental value of the ABCD2 score in the emergency department evaluation of transient ischemic attack. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jan;57(1):46-51.</ref><ref>Ghia D, Thomas P. Low positive predictive value of the ABCD2 score in emergency department transient ischaemic attack diagnoses: the South Western Sydney transient ischaemic attack study. Intern Med J. 2012 Aug;42(8):913-8.</ref>


==Source==
'''Scoring'''
*Age >60yr (1 pt)
*BP (SBP >140 OR diastolic >90) (1 pt)
*Clinical Features
**Isolated speech disturbance (1 pt)
**Unilateral weakness (2 pts)
*Duration of symptoms
**10-59 min (1 pt)
**>60 min (2 pts)
*[[Diabetes mellitus]] (1 pt)


{| class="wikitable"
|-
| '''Points'''
| '''Stroke Risk'''
| '''Two Days'''
| '''Seven Days'''
| '''90 Days'''
|-
| 0-3
| Low
| 1.0%
| 1.2%
| 3.1%
|-
| 4-5
| Moderate
| 4.1%
| 5.9%
| 9.8%
|-
| 6-7
| High
| 8.1%
| 11.7%
| 17.8%
|}


DONALDSON (Smith, Lampe, NEJM '07, Pani)
*According to the 2018 Canadian Heart and Stroke Guideline, the '''Clinical''' component of the ABCD2 score is the most important prognostic feature<ref>Boulanger JM, Lindsay MP, Gubitz G, et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Acute Stroke Management: Prehospital, Emergency Department, and Acute Inpatient Stroke Care, 6th Edition, Update 2018. Int J Stroke. 2018;:1747493018786616.</ref>
**Very high risk for recurrent stroke are the following symptoms that have occurred within the last 48 hours
***Transient, fluctuating or persistent unilateral weakness (face, arm and/or leg)
***Transient, fluctuating or persistent language/speech disturbance
***And/or fluctuating or persistent symptoms without motor weakness or language/speech disturbance


== Calculators ==
{{ABCD2_Calculator}}


==External Links==
*[http://www.mdcalc.com/abcd2-score-for-tia/ MDCalc ABCD2 Score]
*[https://www.acep.org/patient-care/clinical-policies/suspected-transient-ischemic-attack/ ACEP Clinical Policy: Suspected Transient Ischemic Attack]


==See Also==
*[[CVA (Main)]]
*[[ACEP clinical policies]]


[[Category:Neuro]]
==References==
<references/>
[[Category:Neurology]]

Revisión actual - 15:07 21 mar 2026

Background

  • Abbreviation: TIA
  • New Definition: a brief episode of neurologic dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord or retinal ischemia, with clinical symptoms typically lasting less than one hour, and without evidence of acute infarction. [1]
    • Should be viewed as analogous to unstable angina
  • Classic Definition: A sudden, focal neurologic deficit that lasts for less than 24 hours, is presumed to be of vascular origin, and is confined to an area of the brain or eye perfused by a specific artery[1]
  • Since 15% of strokes are preceded by TIA, timely eval of high risk conditions like Atrial Fibrillation and Carotid Stenosis is important

Clinical Features

Differential Diagnosis

Stroke-like Symptoms

Evaluation

Stroke Work-Up

  • Labs
    • POC glucose
    • CBC
    • Chemistry
    • Coags
    • Troponin
    • T&S
  • ECG
    • In large ICH or stroke, may see deep TWI and prolong QT, occ ST changes
  • Head CT (non-contrast)
    • In ischemia stroke CT has sensitivity 42%, specificity 91%[2]
    • In acute ICH the sensitivity is 95-100%[3]
    • The goal of CTH is to identify stroke mimics (ICH, mass lesions, etc .)[4]
  • Also consider:
    • CTA brain and neck
      • To check for large vessel occlusion for potential thrombectomy
      • Determine if there is carotid stenosis that warrants endarterectomy urgently
    • Pregnancy test
    • CXR (if infection suspected)
    • UA (if infection suspected)
    • Utox (if ingestion suspected)

MR Imaging (for Rule-Out CVA or TIA)

  • MRI Brain with DWI, ADC (without contrast) AND
  • Cervical vascular imaging (ACEP Level B in patients with high short-term risk for stroke):[5]
    • MRA brain (without contrast) AND
    • MRA neck (without contrast)
      • May instead use Carotid CTA or US (Carotid US slightly less sensitive than MRA)[6] (ACEP Level C)

Management

  • Little acute management (given normally resolution of symptoms)
  • Consider Aspirin 325 mg PO (once hemorrhage ruled-out) for low risk TIA (ABCD2 score < 4)
  • Consider dual antiplatelet therapy for high risk TIA (ABCD2 score ≥ 4)[7]
    • Load with Aspirin 325 mg chewed, followed by ASA 81 mg PO daily
    • Load with Clopidogrel 300 mg PO followed by 75 mg daily for 3 weeks only

Medication Dosing

Aspirin 325mg chewed, then 81mg PO daily PO Clopidogrel 300mg PO load, then 75mg daily x 3 weeks PO«Clopidogrel Dual antiplatelet for high-risk TIA (ABCD2 >» contiene el carácter registrado «>» como parte de la etiqueta de una propiedad. Por ello, se ha clasificado como no válido.

Disposition

ACEP Guidelines[5]

  • Level B: In adult patients with suspected TIA, do not rely on current existing risk stratification instruments (eg, age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA and presence of diabetes [ABCD2] score) to identify TIA patients who can be safely discharged from the ED.
    • In contrast to the 2009 AHA/ASA recommendations that were based on limited research, the ABCD2 does not sufficiently identify the short-term risk for stroke to use alone as a risk-stratification instrument.
    • Multiple other risk-stratification instruments have been evaluated less frequently than the ABCD2 score. None have demonstrated the ability to identify individual patients at sufficiently low short-term risk for stroke to use alone as a risk-stratification instrument.
  • Level B: A rapid ED based diagnostic protocol can be used to safely identify patients at short-term risk for stroke.
    • Study based on observation units and outpatient TIA clinics[8]
Example of a rapid ED protocol for TIA

Prognosis

Canadian TIA Score

  • The score offers better performance than ABCD2 in predicting stroke risk after TIA, particularly low risk. [9]

Item Scoring

  • Clinical Findings:
    • 1. First TIA (in lifetime) (2 pt)
    • 2. Symptoms ≥10 minutes (2 pt)
    • 3. Past history of carotid stenosis (2 pt)
    • 4. Already on antiplatelet therapy (3 pt)
    • 5. History of gait disturbance (1 pt)
    • 6. History of unilateral weakness (1 pt)
    • 7. History of vertigo (-3 pts)
    • 8. Initial triage diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg (3 pt)
    • 9. Dysarthria or aphasia (history or examination) (3 pt)
  • Investigations in the emergency department:
    • 1.Atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram (2 pt)
    • 2.Infarction (new or old) on computed tomography (1 pt)
    • 3.Platelet count≥400×109/L (2 pt)
    • 4.Glucose ≥15 mmol/L (3pt)
Points Stroke Risk Risk of Stroke or Carotid Revascularization in 7 Days
-3-3 Low .5%
4-8 Medium Risk 2.3%
≥9 High 5.9%

ABCD2 Score[10]

  • Risk of stroke at 2d, 7d, and 90d from TIA
  • Although prognostic, evidence-based admission thresholds have not been determined
  • None with score <3 had CVA within one week in study
  • Studies have failed to validate the ABCD2 score, and may cause physicians to incorrectly classify ~8% of patients as low risk, with sensitivity of the score for high risk patients only ~30%[11][12]

Scoring

  • Age >60yr (1 pt)
  • BP (SBP >140 OR diastolic >90) (1 pt)
  • Clinical Features
    • Isolated speech disturbance (1 pt)
    • Unilateral weakness (2 pts)
  • Duration of symptoms
    • 10-59 min (1 pt)
    • >60 min (2 pts)
  • Diabetes mellitus (1 pt)
Points Stroke Risk Two Days Seven Days 90 Days
0-3 Low 1.0% 1.2% 3.1%
4-5 Moderate 4.1% 5.9% 9.8%
6-7 High 8.1% 11.7% 17.8%
  • According to the 2018 Canadian Heart and Stroke Guideline, the Clinical component of the ABCD2 score is the most important prognostic feature[13]
    • Very high risk for recurrent stroke are the following symptoms that have occurred within the last 48 hours
      • Transient, fluctuating or persistent unilateral weakness (face, arm and/or leg)
      • Transient, fluctuating or persistent language/speech disturbance
      • And/or fluctuating or persistent symptoms without motor weakness or language/speech disturbance

Calculators

ABCD2 Score for TIA

ABCD2 Score — TIA Stroke Risk
Criteria Select
A — Age 1 <60 years (0)   ≥60 years (+1)
B — Blood Pressure 1 SBP <140 and DBP <90 (0)   SBP ≥140 or DBP ≥90 (+1)
C — Clinical Features 1 Other symptoms (0)   Speech disturbance without weakness (+1)   Unilateral weakness (+2)
D — Duration of symptoms 1 <10 minutes (0)   10–59 minutes (+1)   ≥60 minutes (+2)
D — Diabetes 1 No (0)   Yes (+1)
ABCD2 Score / 7
Interpretation — 2-Day Stroke Risk After TIA
0–3 Low risk — 1.0% risk of stroke within 2 days.
4–5 Moderate risk — 4.1% risk. Consider urgent workup and admission.
6–7 High risk — 8.1% risk. Admit for urgent evaluation and treatment.
References
  • Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):283-292. PMID 17258668.

External Links

See Also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Albers GW, et al. The TIA Working Group. Transient ischemic attack: proposal for a new definition. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1713–1716.
  2. ↑ Mullins ME, Schaefer PW, Sorensen AG, Halpern EF, Ay H, He J, Koroshetz WJ, Gonzalez RG. CT and conventional and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in acute stroke: study in 691 patients at presentation to the emergency department. Radiology. 2002 Aug;224(2):353-60.
  3. ↑ Suarez JI, Tarr RW, Selman WR. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(4):387–396.
  4. ↑ Douglas VC, Johnston CM, Elkins J, et al. Head computed tomography findings predict short-term stroke risk after transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2003;34:2894-2899.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 ACEP Clinical Policy: Suspected Transient Ischemic Attack full text
  6. ↑ Nederkoorn PJ, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Accuracy of noninvasive testing. Stroke. 2002;33:2003-2008.
  7. ↑ Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, Barsan W, Conwit RA, Elm JJ, Kim AS, Lindblad AS, Palesch YY. Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk TIA. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):215-225.
  8. ↑ Ross MA, Compton S, Medado P, et al. An emergency department diagnostic protocol for patients with transient ischemic attack: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50:109-119
  9. ↑ Perry JJ et al. Prospective validation of Canadian TIA Score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study.BMJ 2021 Feb 4.
  10. ↑ Johnston SC, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack.Lancet. 2007; 369(9558):283-92.
  11. ↑ Stead LG, Suravaram S. An assessment of the incremental value of the ABCD2 score in the emergency department evaluation of transient ischemic attack. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jan;57(1):46-51.
  12. ↑ Ghia D, Thomas P. Low positive predictive value of the ABCD2 score in emergency department transient ischaemic attack diagnoses: the South Western Sydney transient ischaemic attack study. Intern Med J. 2012 Aug;42(8):913-8.
  13. ↑ Boulanger JM, Lindsay MP, Gubitz G, et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Acute Stroke Management: Prehospital, Emergency Department, and Acute Inpatient Stroke Care, 6th Edition, Update 2018. Int J Stroke. 2018;:1747493018786616.
Obtenido de «https://www.wikem.org/w/index.php?title=Transient_ischemic_attack&oldid=387921»