Diferencia entre revisiones de «EBQ:Jolt Test»
(Fixed empty Clinical Question and Interventions sections) |
|||
| (No se muestran 5 ediciones intermedias de 4 usuarios) | |||
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
{{JC info | |||
| title= Jolt Accentuation of Headache Test for Meningitis | |||
| abbreviation= Jolt Test | |||
| expansion= | |||
| published= | |||
| author= Multiple authors | |||
| journal= Evidence Review | |||
| year= | |||
| volume= | |||
| issue= | |||
| pages= | |||
| pmid= | |||
| fulltexturl= | |||
| pdfurl= | |||
| status = Complete | |||
}} | |||
==Definition== | |||
*Horizontal rotation of the head at frequency of 2 rotations/second - exacerbation of pre-existing headache is positive test. | |||
*Although a 1991 study<ref>Jolt accentuation of headache: the most sensitive sign of CSF pleocytosis. Headache. 1991 Mar;31(3):167-71.</ref> showed high sensitivity with this test, multiple newer studies have cast doubt on its sensitivity<ref>Absence of jolt accentuation of headache cannot accurately rule out meningitis in adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;31(11):1601-4</ref><ref>Jolt accentuation of headache and other clinical signs: poor predictors of meningitis in adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;32(1):24-8</ref>. Although it may be clinically useful in the right subset of patients, it should not be considered to be 100% Sn | |||
==Clinical Question== | ==Clinical Question== | ||
Can jolt accentuation of headache (worsening of headache with horizontal head rotation) reliably identify patients with meningitis or CSF pleocytosis? | |||
==Pro Argument== | ==Pro Argument== | ||
| Línea 16: | Línea 37: | ||
===Trial 3=== | ===Trial 3=== | ||
==Conclusion== | |||
*The jolt accentuation test has variable sensitivity and specificity for meningitis depending on the study | |||
*Original study showed high sensitivity (97%), but subsequent studies have shown lower sensitivity | |||
*The test should not be used in isolation to rule out meningitis | |||
==Major Points== | |||
*The jolt test involves having the patient turn their head horizontally at a rate of 2-3 rotations per second | |||
*Positive test: worsening of baseline headache with jolt maneuver | |||
*Initial study by Uchihara and Tsukagoshi (1991) reported 97% sensitivity for CSF pleocytosis | |||
*Subsequent validation studies have shown lower sensitivity (55-63%), limiting its use as a standalone screening tool | |||
*Best used as one component of clinical assessment rather than a definitive rule-out test | |||
==Study Design== | |||
*Multiple studies examined: original derivation study and subsequent validation studies | |||
*Prospective observational studies comparing jolt test results to lumbar puncture findings | |||
==Population== | |||
*Adult patients presenting with headache and suspected meningitis | |||
*Patients undergoing lumbar puncture for clinical suspicion of CNS infection | |||
==Interventions== | |||
*No therapeutic intervention; diagnostic accuracy study | |||
*Jolt accentuation maneuver performed at bedside prior to lumbar puncture | |||
*CSF pleocytosis (WBC >5 cells/uL) used as reference standard | |||
==Outcomes== | |||
*Original Uchihara study: sensitivity 97%, specificity 60% | |||
*Validation studies: sensitivity ranges from 55-97% depending on population and meningitis prevalence | |||
*Negative likelihood ratios in validation studies are not sufficiently low to safely rule out meningitis | |||
==Criticisms== | |||
*Original study was small (n=54) and conducted in a Japanese population with high meningitis prevalence | |||
*Subsequent larger studies have not replicated the high sensitivity | |||
*The test is painful to perform in patients with severe headache and may be refused | |||
*Cannot distinguish bacterial from viral meningitis | |||
*Low specificity leads to many false positives, potentially increasing unnecessary lumbar punctures | |||
==Funding== | |||
*Variable across studies | |||
==See Also== | |||
*[[Meningitis]] | |||
== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:EBQ]] | [[Category:EBQ]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Neurology]] | ||
Revisión actual - 23:00 21 mar 2026
Complete Journal Club Article
Multiple authors. "Jolt Accentuation of Headache Test for Meningitis". Evidence Review. . :.
PubMed
PubMed
Definition
- Horizontal rotation of the head at frequency of 2 rotations/second - exacerbation of pre-existing headache is positive test.
- Although a 1991 study[1] showed high sensitivity with this test, multiple newer studies have cast doubt on its sensitivity[2][3]. Although it may be clinically useful in the right subset of patients, it should not be considered to be 100% Sn
Clinical Question
Can jolt accentuation of headache (worsening of headache with horizontal head rotation) reliably identify patients with meningitis or CSF pleocytosis?
Pro Argument
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Con Argument
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Conclusion
- The jolt accentuation test has variable sensitivity and specificity for meningitis depending on the study
- Original study showed high sensitivity (97%), but subsequent studies have shown lower sensitivity
- The test should not be used in isolation to rule out meningitis
Major Points
- The jolt test involves having the patient turn their head horizontally at a rate of 2-3 rotations per second
- Positive test: worsening of baseline headache with jolt maneuver
- Initial study by Uchihara and Tsukagoshi (1991) reported 97% sensitivity for CSF pleocytosis
- Subsequent validation studies have shown lower sensitivity (55-63%), limiting its use as a standalone screening tool
- Best used as one component of clinical assessment rather than a definitive rule-out test
Study Design
- Multiple studies examined: original derivation study and subsequent validation studies
- Prospective observational studies comparing jolt test results to lumbar puncture findings
Population
- Adult patients presenting with headache and suspected meningitis
- Patients undergoing lumbar puncture for clinical suspicion of CNS infection
Interventions
- No therapeutic intervention; diagnostic accuracy study
- Jolt accentuation maneuver performed at bedside prior to lumbar puncture
- CSF pleocytosis (WBC >5 cells/uL) used as reference standard
Outcomes
- Original Uchihara study: sensitivity 97%, specificity 60%
- Validation studies: sensitivity ranges from 55-97% depending on population and meningitis prevalence
- Negative likelihood ratios in validation studies are not sufficiently low to safely rule out meningitis
Criticisms
- Original study was small (n=54) and conducted in a Japanese population with high meningitis prevalence
- Subsequent larger studies have not replicated the high sensitivity
- The test is painful to perform in patients with severe headache and may be refused
- Cannot distinguish bacterial from viral meningitis
- Low specificity leads to many false positives, potentially increasing unnecessary lumbar punctures
Funding
- Variable across studies
See Also
References
- ↑ Jolt accentuation of headache: the most sensitive sign of CSF pleocytosis. Headache. 1991 Mar;31(3):167-71.
- ↑ Absence of jolt accentuation of headache cannot accurately rule out meningitis in adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;31(11):1601-4
- ↑ Jolt accentuation of headache and other clinical signs: poor predictors of meningitis in adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;32(1):24-8
