Diferencia entre revisiones de «EBQ:End-Tidal CO2 Monitoring»

(Created page with "http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/pdf http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/abstract;jsessionid=824B9712DBE9B49896F62577CE22B...")
 
 
(No se muestran 16 ediciones intermedias de 3 usuarios)
Línea 1: Línea 1:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/pdf
{{JC info
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/abstract;jsessionid=824B9712DBE9B49896F62577CE22B5FE.f01t01
| title= Does end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring detect respiratory events prior to current sedation monitoring practices?
| abbreviation=
| expansion=
| published= 2006
| author= Burton J. et al.
| journal= Acad Emerg Med
| year= 2006
| volume= 13
| issue=5
| pages= 500-4
| pmid= 16569750
| fulltexturl= http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/abstract;jsessionid=824B9712DBE9B49896F62577CE22B5FE.f01t01
| pdfurl=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/asset/j.aem.2005.12.017.pdf;jsessionid=B3E2A9FDC4D927487D17F1907348DAF7.f03t02?v=1&t=hudj7adh&s=df8d12213b724a997e009b079849fbf28e6bf3af
}}
==Clinical Question==
Can end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) monitoring during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) detect acute respiratory events earlier than standard monitoring methods (e.g., SpO₂, clinical observation)?
 
==Conclusion==
ETCO₂ monitoring identified the majority of acute respiratory events during PSA, and in 70% of these cases, abnormalities were detected before clinical recognition via SpO₂ or observed hypoventilation. ETCO₂ monitoring offers earlier detection of respiratory compromise than current standard practices.
 
==Major Points==
*33% of PSA encounters included acute respiratory events.
*85% of those with respiratory events had abnormal ETCO₂ findings.
*In 70% of events, abnormal ETCO₂ was recorded before observed clinical signs.
*Many ETCO₂ abnormalities were not associated with interventions, suggesting possible transient or clinically insignificant episodes.
*Use of capnography may enhance detection of early hypoventilation or apnea and improve patient safety during PSA.
 
==Study Design==
* Prospective, observational case series using a convenience sample.
* Single-center, 500-bed tertiary hospital emergency department.
* Blinded design: Clinical staff were blinded to ETCO₂ readings; a study investigator monitored and recorded data.
* Institutional review board-approved with interim safety analyses performed after every 30 patients.
 
==Population==
* 59 patients undergoing 60 PSA encounters (1 patient had 2 separate sedations during the same ED visit).
* Procedures included joint dislocations, cardioversions, wound closures, and fracture reductions.
 
===Patient Demographics===
* Median age: 38 years (range: 1–89)
* 58% male
* Most common PSA medication: Propofol (68%)
 
===Inclusion Criteria===
* Adults and children receiving PSA in the ED
 
===Exclusion Criteria===
* Inability to provide informed consent
* No investigator available for enrollment
 
==Interventions==
* Standard PSA monitoring: SpO₂, heart rate, respiratory rate, cardiac rhythm, and BP.
* Study intervention: Continuous ETCO₂ monitoring via nasal cannula with integrated CO₂ sampling and oxygen delivery (2 L/min).
* Clinical team blinded to ETCO₂ data.
 
==Outcomes==
 
===Primary Outcome===
Detection of acute respiratory events, including:
* SpO₂ < 92%
* Increased oxygen requirements
* Use of airway adjuncts or bag-valve mask
* Patient repositioning
* Physical/verbal stimulation
* Reversal agent administration
 
===Secondary Outcomes===
Abnormal ETCO₂ defined as:
* Change of ≥10 mmHg from baseline
* Absolute value <30 mmHg or >50 mmHg
 
===Subgroup analysis===
Of the 20 respiratory events:
* 17 (85%) had abnormal ETCO₂ findings
* 14 (70%) showed ETCO₂ abnormalities before SpO₂ or clinical observation changes
* In 44% of cases with abnormal ETCO₂, no other clinical interventions were performed
 
==Criticisms & Further Discussion==
* No continuous waveform data recorded; data points logged every 30 seconds
* Sampling bias possible: higher than expected rate of respiratory events (33% vs. anticipated 15%)—may reflect sicker patients or deeper sedation
* Some abnormal ETCO₂ findings were transient and not clinically significant
* Study terminated early for ethical and safety reasons—planned for 250 patients but stopped after 60
 
==Funding==
*Medtronic Emergency Response Systems loaned the LIFEPAK 12 monitors for the study
 
==References==
<references/>
 
[[Category:EBQ]]
 
[[Category:Pulmonary]][[Category:Critical Care]]

Revisión actual - 19:59 21 may 2025

incomplete Journal Club Article
Burton J. et al.. "Does end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring detect respiratory events prior to current sedation monitoring practices?". Acad Emerg Med. 2006. 13(5):500-4.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

Can end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) monitoring during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) detect acute respiratory events earlier than standard monitoring methods (e.g., SpO₂, clinical observation)?

Conclusion

ETCO₂ monitoring identified the majority of acute respiratory events during PSA, and in 70% of these cases, abnormalities were detected before clinical recognition via SpO₂ or observed hypoventilation. ETCO₂ monitoring offers earlier detection of respiratory compromise than current standard practices.

Major Points

  • 33% of PSA encounters included acute respiratory events.
  • 85% of those with respiratory events had abnormal ETCO₂ findings.
  • In 70% of events, abnormal ETCO₂ was recorded before observed clinical signs.
  • Many ETCO₂ abnormalities were not associated with interventions, suggesting possible transient or clinically insignificant episodes.
  • Use of capnography may enhance detection of early hypoventilation or apnea and improve patient safety during PSA.

Study Design

  • Prospective, observational case series using a convenience sample.
  • Single-center, 500-bed tertiary hospital emergency department.
  • Blinded design: Clinical staff were blinded to ETCO₂ readings; a study investigator monitored and recorded data.
  • Institutional review board-approved with interim safety analyses performed after every 30 patients.

Population

  • 59 patients undergoing 60 PSA encounters (1 patient had 2 separate sedations during the same ED visit).
  • Procedures included joint dislocations, cardioversions, wound closures, and fracture reductions.

Patient Demographics

  • Median age: 38 years (range: 1–89)
  • 58% male
  • Most common PSA medication: Propofol (68%)

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults and children receiving PSA in the ED

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • No investigator available for enrollment

Interventions

  • Standard PSA monitoring: SpO₂, heart rate, respiratory rate, cardiac rhythm, and BP.
  • Study intervention: Continuous ETCO₂ monitoring via nasal cannula with integrated CO₂ sampling and oxygen delivery (2 L/min).
  • Clinical team blinded to ETCO₂ data.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

Detection of acute respiratory events, including:

  • SpO₂ < 92%
  • Increased oxygen requirements
  • Use of airway adjuncts or bag-valve mask
  • Patient repositioning
  • Physical/verbal stimulation
  • Reversal agent administration

Secondary Outcomes

Abnormal ETCO₂ defined as:

  • Change of ≥10 mmHg from baseline
  • Absolute value <30 mmHg or >50 mmHg

Subgroup analysis

Of the 20 respiratory events:

  • 17 (85%) had abnormal ETCO₂ findings
  • 14 (70%) showed ETCO₂ abnormalities before SpO₂ or clinical observation changes
  • In 44% of cases with abnormal ETCO₂, no other clinical interventions were performed

Criticisms & Further Discussion

  • No continuous waveform data recorded; data points logged every 30 seconds
  • Sampling bias possible: higher than expected rate of respiratory events (33% vs. anticipated 15%)—may reflect sicker patients or deeper sedation
  • Some abnormal ETCO₂ findings were transient and not clinically significant
  • Study terminated early for ethical and safety reasons—planned for 250 patients but stopped after 60

Funding

  • Medtronic Emergency Response Systems loaned the LIFEPAK 12 monitors for the study

References