Diferencia entre revisiones de «EBQ:End-Tidal CO2 Monitoring»
(Created page with "http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/pdf http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/abstract;jsessionid=824B9712DBE9B49896F62577CE22B...") |
|||
| (No se muestran 16 ediciones intermedias de 3 usuarios) | |||
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/ | {{JC info | ||
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ | | title= Does end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring detect respiratory events prior to current sedation monitoring practices? | ||
| abbreviation= | |||
| expansion= | |||
| published= 2006 | |||
| author= Burton J. et al. | |||
| journal= Acad Emerg Med | |||
| year= 2006 | |||
| volume= 13 | |||
| issue=5 | |||
| pages= 500-4 | |||
| pmid= 16569750 | |||
| fulltexturl= http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/abstract;jsessionid=824B9712DBE9B49896F62577CE22B5FE.f01t01 | |||
| pdfurl=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.017/asset/j.aem.2005.12.017.pdf;jsessionid=B3E2A9FDC4D927487D17F1907348DAF7.f03t02?v=1&t=hudj7adh&s=df8d12213b724a997e009b079849fbf28e6bf3af | |||
}} | |||
==Clinical Question== | |||
Can end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) monitoring during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) detect acute respiratory events earlier than standard monitoring methods (e.g., SpO₂, clinical observation)? | |||
==Conclusion== | |||
ETCO₂ monitoring identified the majority of acute respiratory events during PSA, and in 70% of these cases, abnormalities were detected before clinical recognition via SpO₂ or observed hypoventilation. ETCO₂ monitoring offers earlier detection of respiratory compromise than current standard practices. | |||
==Major Points== | |||
*33% of PSA encounters included acute respiratory events. | |||
*85% of those with respiratory events had abnormal ETCO₂ findings. | |||
*In 70% of events, abnormal ETCO₂ was recorded before observed clinical signs. | |||
*Many ETCO₂ abnormalities were not associated with interventions, suggesting possible transient or clinically insignificant episodes. | |||
*Use of capnography may enhance detection of early hypoventilation or apnea and improve patient safety during PSA. | |||
==Study Design== | |||
* Prospective, observational case series using a convenience sample. | |||
* Single-center, 500-bed tertiary hospital emergency department. | |||
* Blinded design: Clinical staff were blinded to ETCO₂ readings; a study investigator monitored and recorded data. | |||
* Institutional review board-approved with interim safety analyses performed after every 30 patients. | |||
==Population== | |||
* 59 patients undergoing 60 PSA encounters (1 patient had 2 separate sedations during the same ED visit). | |||
* Procedures included joint dislocations, cardioversions, wound closures, and fracture reductions. | |||
===Patient Demographics=== | |||
* Median age: 38 years (range: 1–89) | |||
* 58% male | |||
* Most common PSA medication: Propofol (68%) | |||
===Inclusion Criteria=== | |||
* Adults and children receiving PSA in the ED | |||
===Exclusion Criteria=== | |||
* Inability to provide informed consent | |||
* No investigator available for enrollment | |||
==Interventions== | |||
* Standard PSA monitoring: SpO₂, heart rate, respiratory rate, cardiac rhythm, and BP. | |||
* Study intervention: Continuous ETCO₂ monitoring via nasal cannula with integrated CO₂ sampling and oxygen delivery (2 L/min). | |||
* Clinical team blinded to ETCO₂ data. | |||
==Outcomes== | |||
===Primary Outcome=== | |||
Detection of acute respiratory events, including: | |||
* SpO₂ < 92% | |||
* Increased oxygen requirements | |||
* Use of airway adjuncts or bag-valve mask | |||
* Patient repositioning | |||
* Physical/verbal stimulation | |||
* Reversal agent administration | |||
===Secondary Outcomes=== | |||
Abnormal ETCO₂ defined as: | |||
* Change of ≥10 mmHg from baseline | |||
* Absolute value <30 mmHg or >50 mmHg | |||
===Subgroup analysis=== | |||
Of the 20 respiratory events: | |||
* 17 (85%) had abnormal ETCO₂ findings | |||
* 14 (70%) showed ETCO₂ abnormalities before SpO₂ or clinical observation changes | |||
* In 44% of cases with abnormal ETCO₂, no other clinical interventions were performed | |||
==Criticisms & Further Discussion== | |||
* No continuous waveform data recorded; data points logged every 30 seconds | |||
* Sampling bias possible: higher than expected rate of respiratory events (33% vs. anticipated 15%)—may reflect sicker patients or deeper sedation | |||
* Some abnormal ETCO₂ findings were transient and not clinically significant | |||
* Study terminated early for ethical and safety reasons—planned for 250 patients but stopped after 60 | |||
==Funding== | |||
*Medtronic Emergency Response Systems loaned the LIFEPAK 12 monitors for the study | |||
==References== | |||
<references/> | |||
[[Category:EBQ]] | |||
[[Category:Pulmonary]][[Category:Critical Care]] | |||
Revisión actual - 19:59 21 may 2025
incomplete Journal Club Article
Burton J. et al.. "Does end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring detect respiratory events prior to current sedation monitoring practices?". Acad Emerg Med. 2006. 13(5):500-4.
PubMed Full text PDF
PubMed Full text PDF
Clinical Question
Can end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) monitoring during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) detect acute respiratory events earlier than standard monitoring methods (e.g., SpO₂, clinical observation)?
Conclusion
ETCO₂ monitoring identified the majority of acute respiratory events during PSA, and in 70% of these cases, abnormalities were detected before clinical recognition via SpO₂ or observed hypoventilation. ETCO₂ monitoring offers earlier detection of respiratory compromise than current standard practices.
Major Points
- 33% of PSA encounters included acute respiratory events.
- 85% of those with respiratory events had abnormal ETCO₂ findings.
- In 70% of events, abnormal ETCO₂ was recorded before observed clinical signs.
- Many ETCO₂ abnormalities were not associated with interventions, suggesting possible transient or clinically insignificant episodes.
- Use of capnography may enhance detection of early hypoventilation or apnea and improve patient safety during PSA.
Study Design
- Prospective, observational case series using a convenience sample.
- Single-center, 500-bed tertiary hospital emergency department.
- Blinded design: Clinical staff were blinded to ETCO₂ readings; a study investigator monitored and recorded data.
- Institutional review board-approved with interim safety analyses performed after every 30 patients.
Population
- 59 patients undergoing 60 PSA encounters (1 patient had 2 separate sedations during the same ED visit).
- Procedures included joint dislocations, cardioversions, wound closures, and fracture reductions.
Patient Demographics
- Median age: 38 years (range: 1–89)
- 58% male
- Most common PSA medication: Propofol (68%)
Inclusion Criteria
- Adults and children receiving PSA in the ED
Exclusion Criteria
- Inability to provide informed consent
- No investigator available for enrollment
Interventions
- Standard PSA monitoring: SpO₂, heart rate, respiratory rate, cardiac rhythm, and BP.
- Study intervention: Continuous ETCO₂ monitoring via nasal cannula with integrated CO₂ sampling and oxygen delivery (2 L/min).
- Clinical team blinded to ETCO₂ data.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome
Detection of acute respiratory events, including:
- SpO₂ < 92%
- Increased oxygen requirements
- Use of airway adjuncts or bag-valve mask
- Patient repositioning
- Physical/verbal stimulation
- Reversal agent administration
Secondary Outcomes
Abnormal ETCO₂ defined as:
- Change of ≥10 mmHg from baseline
- Absolute value <30 mmHg or >50 mmHg
Subgroup analysis
Of the 20 respiratory events:
- 17 (85%) had abnormal ETCO₂ findings
- 14 (70%) showed ETCO₂ abnormalities before SpO₂ or clinical observation changes
- In 44% of cases with abnormal ETCO₂, no other clinical interventions were performed
Criticisms & Further Discussion
- No continuous waveform data recorded; data points logged every 30 seconds
- Sampling bias possible: higher than expected rate of respiratory events (33% vs. anticipated 15%)—may reflect sicker patients or deeper sedation
- Some abnormal ETCO₂ findings were transient and not clinically significant
- Study terminated early for ethical and safety reasons—planned for 250 patients but stopped after 60
Funding
- Medtronic Emergency Response Systems loaned the LIFEPAK 12 monitors for the study
